| |
 |
| Here
is a picture of me making my very first technical presentation
at the 17th Space Simulation Conference in 1992. I took a public
speaking class prior to the conference, and spent 6 grueling
months performing extensive research for the paper I was presenting:
On-Orbit Deployment Anomalies: What Can
Be Done? |
|
Over
the years, I've authored numerous technical articles, and presented
several papers at technical symposiums and meetings.
The technical documents for which I have hard copies are contained
in the links below. Publications which are not present include
the following:
- "Using
Your Vibration System For Shock Testing," TEST
Engineering and Management, June/July 1990
- "10
Tips To Protect Your UUT During ESS," TEST Engineering
and Management, December/January 1990-91
- "3-Axis
Vibration Test System Simulates Real World," TEST
Engineering and Management, December/January 1990-91.
|
|
|
| Books |
| |
|
 |
Pioneers
of Shock and Vibration
Shock and Vibration Analysis Center (SAVIAC), SVM-14, 1996
ISBN No. 0-9646940-1-8
Pages: 238
Preface
Throughout the fifty years following the end of World War II, many
individuals have written retrospective views on the subject of dynamic
and environmental testing. Most have focused on significant equipment
developments and technology advances in the field, but few have ever
focused on the individuals who made these progressions possible --
the pioneers.
|
| |
Click
Here to learn more about the book.
Click Here to visit the SAVIAC website. |
|
| Papers |
|
|
 |
Development
of an ATE Test Station for Mixed CATV/Telco Products
International Test Conference Proceedings, October 1995
Abstract
This paper summarizes the development of a manufacturing ATE station
for the testing of digital headend cable television (CATV) products,
which utilize telecommunications transport protocols and RF pass-band
architectures to deliver Interactive Video Services.
|
| |
Click
Here to download Adobe PDF File |
|
 |
Utilizing
a Modular Test Interface to Reduce ATE Cost, Increase Efficiency
4th International Workshop - ITC 1996, October 1996
Abstract
This article outlines the use of a modular test interface in an
ATE environment to significantly reduce ATE system cost and product
test time. Other benefits include a marked reduction in operator-induced
errors, station development time, and the elimination of duplicate
test stations. The article details the implementation of the interface
method in a production environment, and the test engineering effort
involved. In addition, a section is dedicated to the discussiona
of problem areas and lessons learned from utilizing this test approach.
|
| |
Click
Here to download Adobe PDF File |
|
| Articles |
|
|
 |
Create
Your Own ActiveX Controls
Test & Measurement World Magazine, September 1998
Microsoft Visual Basic 5.0 (VB5) lets you add custom controls
that extend the language. Typical controls for engineers include charts,
knobs, sliders, and temperature scales. Custom controls also give
engineers access to hardware such as data-acquisition boards.
You also can add custom controls, called ActiveX controls, to any
ActiveX control-compliant language such as Visual C++, Delphi, PowerBuilder,
VEE, LabView, and TestPoint. (ActiveX controls were known as OLE/OCX
custom controls under VB4 and were known as VBX controls under VB3.)
By using ActiveX controls with Microsoft Office, you can control instruments
directly from Word, Access, or Excel. ActiveX controls promote software
reuse, because once you have a control, you can use it in any application.
|
| |
Click
Here to read the article online on the Test & Measurement
Website
Click
Here to download Adobe PDF File |
|
 |
Flying
Prober Simplifies Testing
Test & Measurement World Magazine, November 1997
At Scientific Atlanta, we couldn't use an in-circuit tester
(ICT) to test prototype PCBs. Prototype PCB designs change continuously
early in the development process, so it's not feasible to design
and build in-circuit fixtures and to generate test programs for
each design. We had to isolate opens, shorts, and other manufacturing
defects by hand. With the complexity and density of surface-mount-technology
PCBs, we had limited success with manual troubleshooting--so limited
in fact, that we often damaged or destroyed boards.
We recently solved out testing problems by purchasing a fixtureless
manufacturing-defects analyzer (MDA), commonly known as a flying-probe
tester. Using the flying-probe tester has proved faster than using
manual troubleshooting methods, and have simplified test programming.
|
| |
Click
Here to download Adobe PDF File |
|
 |
Prevent
Your Test Station From Tipping
Test & Measurement World Magazine, November 1996
When someone
either leans or sits on a worksurface installed on a test rack,
a potentially dangerous situation exists. The downward force that
is exerted could make the station tip over, possibly injuring someone
or damaging the test equipment. Unfortunately, this occurrence is
common.
To prevent such a scenario at your company, you should follow sound
safety practices and guidelines for setting up and integrating test
station racks The following tips should provide a reasonable level
of safety without costing your company a bundle.
|
| |
Click
Here to download Adobe PDF File |
|
 |
Spacecraft
On-Orbit Deployment Anomalies: What Can Be Done?
IEEE Aerospace & Electronic Systems Magazine, April 1993
Modern communications
satellites rely heavily upon deployable appendage (i.e. solar arrays,
communications antennas, etc.) to perform vital functions that enable
the spacecraft to effectively conduct mission objectives. Communications
and telemetry antennas provide the radio frequency link between
the spacecraft and the earth groundstation, permitting data to be
transmitted and received from the satellite. Solar arrays serve
as the principle source of electrical energy to the satellite, and
recharge internal batteries during operation. However, since satellites
cannot carry backup systems, if a solar array fails to deploy, the
mission is lost.
This article examines the subject of on-orbit anomalies related
to the deployment of spacecraft appendage, and possible causes of
such failures. Topics discussed shall include mechanical launch
loading, on-orbit thermal and solar concerns, reliability of spacecraft
pyrotechnics, and practical limitations of ground-based deployment
testing. Of particular significance, the article will feature an
in-depth look at the lessons learned from the successful recovery
of the Telesat Canada Anik-E2 satellite in 1991.
|
| |
Click
Here to download Adobe PDF File |
|
|
|
3-D
vibration test system: powerful, unusual, international
TEST Engineering & Management Magazine, August/September
1992
During the early
1980s, the National Space Development Agency (NASDA) decided to
begin the planning and construction of a wholly new, integrated
environmental and structural test facility. This facility was specifically
designed to handle the large satelittes of the future at NASDA's
research and development center (Figure 1).
|
| |
Click
Here to download Adobe PDF File |
|
 |
Experimental
test method: multi-axis shock testing
TEST Engineering & Management Magazine, June/July 1991
For years, one
of the most time-consuming aspects of shock testing has been the
mechanical repositioning of the test article for excitation in other
test axes, or for change of axial direction. Presently, a relatively
new method of shock testing is being investigated in hopes that
the technique will decrease the time required for shock testing
to a fraction of that using conventional shock test methods. Multi-axis
excitation, or multi-axis shock testing, is an evolving technique
of applying multiple transient waveforms simultaneously to different
Unit-Under-Test (UUT) axes. The method is actually an extension
of multi-axis vibration testing. In fact, the achievement of multi-dimensional
motions requires the use of a multi-exciter vibration system configured
to perform shaker shock testing. The attributes of the technique
include increased testing throughput, greater force-generating capabilities,
and the application of transient waveforms in amanner that more
closely approximates shock field data.
|
| |
Click
Here to download Adobe PDF File |
| |
|
| |
|
|